Archive for February 13th, 2008

Does Length-Based Resuscitation Tape Accurately Place Pediatric Patients Into Appropriate Color-Coded Zones?

Original Articles

Pediatric Emergency Care. 23(12):856-861, December 2007.
Hashikawa, Andrew MD *; Juhn, Young MD, MPH *; Homme, James MD +; Gardner, Brian PharmD ++; Moore, Brian MD *+

Abstract:
Objective: To determine relationship between length-based resuscitation tape (LBT)-based color-coded zones and actual weight-based color-coded zones.

Methods: Data were retrospectively abstracted from 839 patients in Rochester, Minnesota, at birth, 4 to 6, and 10 to 12 years. Height was plotted on LBT to determine estimated weight and corresponding color zone. Patient’s weight-based color zone was obtained by plotting measured weight on LBT. Degrees of discrepancy between length-based and actual weight-based color zones were assessed.

Results: Total of 544, 520, and 143 subjects were analyzed at birth, 4 to 6, and 10 to 12 years, respectively, with a subset of 103 subjects measured longitudinally at more than 1 age strata. Among infants, all LBT color zones were the same as actual weight-based color zones. In children aged 4 to 6 years, 70% (n = 361) of LBT-estimated color zones were the same as actual weight-based color zones; LBT underestimated 19% (n = 99) by 1 color zone, 0.5% (n = 3) were underestimated by 2 color zones, 0.5% (n = 3) exceeded weight limit on LBT, and 10% (n = 54) were overestimated by 1 color zone. In adolescents aged 10 to 12 years, 40.6% (n = 58) of LBT-estimated color zones were the same as actual weight-based color zones; LBT underestimated 3.5% (n = 5) by 1 color zone, 44.1% (n = 63) exceeded weight limit on LBT, 11.2% (n = 16) were overestimated by 1 color zone, and 0.6% (n = 1) were overestimated by 2 color zones.

Conclusions: Overall, LBT reasonably estimates appropriate color zones for drug dosing. However, LBT tends to underestimate color zones among younger obese children and adolescents. Potential implications of the rising trend of overweight children on resuscitation practice and drug administration must be considered.

Optimal Surface Electrocardiogram Lead for Identification of the Mechanism of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Children

Original Articles

Pediatric Emergency Care. 24(1):28-30, January 2008.
Liberman, Leonardo MD; Pass, Robert H. MD; Starc, Thomas J. MD

Abstract:
Objective: Although supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) can be identified from any lead of the bedside monitor, the mechanism of tachycardia is not always obvious. We analyzed the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in SVT of pediatric patients with different mechanisms of SVT to determine if there is a consistent optimal lead for rhythm identification.

Methods: Twelve-lead ECGs during SVT were available for retrospective analysis in 54 patients. The tachycardia mechanism was determined either by intracardiac or transesophageal recording, or after cardioversion analysis of atrial flutter or fibrillation. Blinded analysis of each separate lead of the 12-lead ECG was done to determine the best lead to diagnose the mechanism of tachycardia. For statistical analysis, [chi]2 or Fisher exact test was used.

Results: From analysis of the surface ECG, the mechanism of SVT could be identified in 49 (91%) of 54 patients. Lead V1 was the most useful lead to determine the tachycardia mechanism. V1 identified the mechanism in 39 (80%) of 49 patients compared with 29 (59%) of 49 in lead III (P < 0.05), 22 (51%) of 49 in lead II (P < 0.01), and 12 (24%) of 49 in V6 (P < 0.001). Lead V1 identified accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia in 15 (68%) of 22 patients, atrial flutter in 12 (87%) of 14 patients, atrial fibrillation in 7 (70%) of 10, and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in 5 (62%) of 8 patients. The mechanism of tachycardia was more readily diagnosed using a combination of V1 and lead III (47/49 patients, 96%) compared with V1 alone (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: A right precordial lead (V1) is the best single lead to diagnose the mechanism of SVT. Furthermore, a combination of V1 and lead III increases the number of patients in whom the mechanism could be identified. Therefore, we recommend that V1 should be combined with an inferior limb lead during cardiac monitoring for optimal identification of the mechanism of SVT in children.

Prescribing Errors in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Original Articles

Pediatric Emergency Care. 24(1):1-8, January 2008.
Rinke, Michael L. BA *; Moon, Margaret MD, MPH *; Clark, John S. PharmD, MS +; Mudd, Shawna MSN, CRNP *; Miller, Marlene R. MD, MSc, FAAP *++

Abstract:
Objectives: To determine the frequency, prescriber, and type of prescribing errors in written in-house orders and ambulatory prescriptions in a pediatric emergency department (PED).

Methods: A 17-day retrospective chart review and a 6-month retrospective ambulatory prescription review in a PED for medications with weight-based dosing. Orders and prescriptions were checked for prescriber identification number, route, weight-based target dose in milligrams per kilogram, frequency, correct dosing, and drug allergies. Narcotics were excluded from the prescription analysis.

Results: Forty-seven (12.5%) of 377 in-house orders and 37 (19.4%) of 191 individual charts contained at least 1 error: 4 (1.1%) orders contained an incorrect dose, 41 (10.8%) were written incorrectly, and 2 (0.5%) contained an incorrect dose and were written incorrectly. Thirty (4.3%) of 696 ambulatory prescriptions contained 1 error: 14 (2.0%) contained an incorrect dose, and 16 (2.3%) were written incorrectly. Pediatric postgraduate year-3 residents had the highest in-house order incorrect dose error rate (1 of 29 orders or 3.5%), and ED pediatric postgraduate year-2 residents had the highest ambulatory prescription incorrect dose error rate (6 of 66 prescriptions or 9.1%). Pediatric ED attending physicians had the highest error rates for writing orders and prescriptions incorrectly, 25% (3 of 12) and 9.7% (3 of 31), respectively. Antibiotics, analgesics, and narcotics were most often involved in errors.

Conclusions: Prescribing errors are common in both written in-house orders and ambulatory prescriptions in a PED. Targeting safety interventions toward groups with less practice in prescribing pediatric doses and reeducating groups on safe medication writing techniques could decrease this error rate.

Predicting Pertussis in Infants

Original Articles

Pediatric Emergency Care. 24(1):16-20, January 2008.
Guinto-Ocampo, Hazel MD; Bennett, Jonathan E. MD; Attia, Magdy W. MD

Abstract:
Background: The incidence of reported cases of pertussis is increasing, despite high rates of vaccination among infants and children. The burden of disease, and rates of complication and death are highest among infants. The limited availability of a timely reliable confirmatory test for pertussis hinders early identification of infected infants.

Objective: Our objective is to identify clinical and laboratory predictors for pertussis among infants.

Methods: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected from the medical records of all infants aged 12 months or younger who underwent confirmatory testing (culture, direct fluorescent assay, or polymerase chain reaction) for Bordetella pertussis from January 1, 2001, to July 31, 2005. The association of 15 variables with a positive pertussis test was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis, and when appropriate, using receiver operating characteristics.

Results: We reviewed the medical records of 141 infants who were tested for pertussis. The mean age was 88 days, and the most common chief complaints were cough and breathing difficulty. Eighteen patients (13%) had a positive pertussis test, and 123 (87%) had a negative test. Bronchiolitis and upper respiratory tract infection were the most common discharge diagnoses among infants with a negative test. The 2 groups were similar with respect to sex, history of cough, vomiting, fever, symptoms of apparent life-threatening event, presence of fever, or hypoxia, and heart rate. Infants who were younger (55 days vs 93 days, P = 0.02), evaluated between July and October (23% vs 9%, P = 0.02), less tachypneic (39 breaths/min vs 47 breaths/min, P = 0.02), had higher white blood cell counts (20,000/[mu]L vs 15000/[mu]L, P = 0.02), higher percentage of lymphocytes (72 vs 55, P = 0.00), and higher absolute lymphocyte counts ([ALC] 14,536/[mu]L vs 8357/[mu]L, P = 0.00) were more likely to have a positive test. Receiver operating characteristics for ALC demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.81, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 to 0.90. An ALC cutoff point of 9400 was determined to maximize sensitivity (89%) and specificity (75%). The negative predictive value of this cutoff point was 97%, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.6, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.3 to 5.4.

Conclusions: Among infants who underwent confirmatory testing for pertussis, those who are younger, evaluated between July and October, less tachypneic, have higher white blood cell counts, higher percentage of lymphocytes, and higher ALCs are more likely to have a positive test. The ALC was the best predictor of pertussis, and an ALC of less than 9400/[mu]L excluded almost all infants without pertussis.

Fewer &quot;Real&quot; American Primary Care Physicians

AP (2/13) reports that “[f]ewer American doctors are focusing on primary care, but the decline is being covered by physicians from other countries,” according to the General Accountability Office (GAO). Data from the GAO indicate that “as of 2006 there were 22,146 American doctors in residency programs in the United States specializing in primary care,” compared to “23,801 in 1995.” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said of this trend, “It is troubling to me that the number of Americans pursuing a career in primary care has declined.” Sanders also noted that the U.S. is “increasingly dependent on international medical school graduates to meet [its] needs.” The GAO reported that “the number of international medical graduates training in primary care had grown from 13,025 in 1995 to 15,565 in 2006.” In contrast, “the number of Americans in training [for specialties] went from 45,300 in 1995 to 47,575 in 2006, and over the same period, international specialists grew from 11,957 to 12,611.” clips free spanking movieporn movies asianmovies lesbian pornmovie reviews adultporn movies long freecumfiesta moviesmovie blowjob britney spearsspears britney sex moviefree lesbian sex moviesfree long xxx movieslg 1400 ringtone7250 blackberry ringtoneass nextel bad ringtone for americanpolyphonic ringtone 3585 nokiacents 50 candy shop ringtone1.00 ringtone330 ringtone philips50 candy ringtone cent shop Map

Tennessee: Free HIV Testing

The Tennessean (2/12, Pinto) reported that with the aid of a Tennessee Department of Health grant, “Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s” ED “will begin performing free HIV testing on adult patients this week, unless they opt out of the procedure.” 

Jeanece Seals, the state’s director of HIV/AIDS programs, said that “17 states are conducting similar programs,” but “Vanderbilt is the only Tennessee” ED “administering the test, unless patients, who will be told about the test, check a box on their paperwork opting out.”  Seals added, “We are interested in making HIV testing a routine part of medical care.”

If you thought our waiting times were long…

LA Times (2/13, Engel) reports, “The honeymoon between the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and its health services director finally foundered Tuesday amid fears that a second county hospital could close.”

Dr. Bruce Chernof, head of the nation’s second-largest public health system, “told the supervisors last week that the federal government would be citing Harbor-UCLA Medical Center for placing its emergency patients in ‘immediate jeopardy’ because of overcrowding and long waits.” Supervisor Gloria Molina said, “I’m very concerned that we’re entering a spiral here very similar to what happened at” Martin Luther King Jr.-Harbor Hospital in Willowbrook, which closed last year.

According to a report prepared by Dr. Chernof, “Harbor-UCLA saw 82,300 emergency patients in the last year. The average wait was 12.2 hours, and 16.6 percent left without” receiving treatment. However, the “supervisors were clearly frustrated when Chernof could not tell them how waiting times at UCLA-Harbor had changed since King-Harbor closed.” The Times notes that “Harbor-UCLA is the third hospital owned by Los Angeles County to undergo federal scrutiny in recent months for” ED fatalities.

Recall: Certain Duragesic Patches May Leak

Wall St. Journal, 2/13/08:  Johnson & Johnson is voluntarily recalling a version of its blockbuster pain patch Duragesic because of manufacturing issues that could lead to accidental overdoses.

Duragesic, for patients experiencing moderate to severe chronic pain, contains fentanyl, an opioid that could lead to problems such as respiratory depression and fatal overdose.

The recall includes all 25-microgram-per-hour patches that are sold in the U.S. by J&J’s PriCara unit and Sandoz; they are made by another J&J unit, Alza Corp.

In all, about 32 million patches will be recalled. PriCara estimates that two per million — 64 total — have the defect.

The Food and Drug Administration issued an alert about fentanyl patches in July 2005.

The issue involves a sliced edge in the pouch that contains the fentanyl gel, which could result in the gel leaking. That could result in an overdose, or leave insufficient medicine.

A handful of product returns alerted PriCara to a possible problem in January, and the company “acted immediately,” says PriCara spokesman Greg Panico. No fatalities were reported, the company said.

An FDA spokeswoman says, “The FDA continues to engage with the company in its voluntary recall, and is investigating the situation.”

Recalls in 2004 were limited to some batches of the 75-microgram patch. The more-widely used 25-microgram patch is prescribe mainly for lower-weight patients, children and patients just starting on the medicine.

Duragesic lost U.S. patent protection in 2005. Nonetheless, the patch still brought in $1.16 billion in 2007, largely because international sales remain strong. J&J’s follow-up pain medicine, called Ionsys, has been delayed coming to market in the U.S. because of manufacturing difficulties.

In its most recent public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, J&J said 72 people have sued the company alleging injury from Duragesic. A case this past summer yielded a $5.5 million verdict.

The recall may boost the hopes of plaintiffs’ attorneys who are claiming that the product is responsible for dozens of deaths.

“Perhaps it is time for the FDA to consider removing the Duragesic patch from the American marketplace, because there are safer alternatives,” says Alex H. MacDonald of MacDonald Rothweiler & Eisenberg LLP, which has filed four wrongful-death suits related to Duragesic.

“We’re acting responsibly by recalling the defective lot,” says the PriCara spokesman, Mr. Panico, adding that the company can’t comment on pending lawsuits. “Despite the defect, there’s much unaffected product on the market and we think overall the patients have been served by this therapeutic option.”

ringtones idol americanringtones akonringtones adultringtones 100 freeharrington amandaabsolutely ringtones freeringtones 24ringtones alltell Map

Blue Cross of California Gets Crucified

San Jose Mercury News, 2/13/08: Facing a torrent of criticism Tuesday, Blue Cross of California abruptly halted its practice of asking physicians in a letter to look for medical conditions that could be used to cancel patients’ insurance coverage.

In a statement issued about 6 p.m., the state’s largest for-profit insurer said, “Today we reached out to our provider partners and California regulators and determined this letter is no longer necessary and, in fact, was creating a misimpression and causing some members and providers undue concern.

“As a result, we are discontinuing the dissemination of this letter going forward.”

The announcement came after blistering rebukes Tuesday by physicians, patients, privacy experts and officials including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., after the Los Angeles Times disclosed the practice.

The letters sent to holders of individual policies in the state came just months after Blue Cross was fined $1 million by the state for unfairly revoking coverage to scores of its policy holders.

“For a company that has gotten a real black eye over the issue of rescinding coverage over the past year – to actually be more aggressive rather than less is simply stunning,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of HealthAccess California, a health care advocacy organization.

“It certainly is not a position physicians want to be put in,” said Dr. Dean Didech, chief medical officer of the San Jose Medical Group, a group of 70 local physicians. “It really is a problem between the doctor-patient relationship.”

In a letter to physicians last week, Blue Cross asked the doctors to “identify members who have failed to disclose medical conditions on their applications that may be considered pre-existing.”

It went on to say that “Blue Cross has the right to cancel a member’s policy back to its effective date for failure to disclose material medical history.”

In a statement earlier Tuesday, Blue Cross defended the letter, saying that it “highly values the trust of its members and understands the personal relationship members have with their physicians and medical groups.” But it also has a responsibility to make sure its records are accurate.

This letter could never have been written, Wright said, if legislation that stalled in the California Legislature earlier this month had been enacted into law. Among other things, the legislation would have meant that insurance companies couldn’t deny coverage based on health status.

Didech put it this way: Medical insurance companies should be forced to provide policies to everyone, “just like a driver’s license.”

Some 19 million Californians receive their health insurance through their employers – and because of the market power of group coverage, insurance companies accept all of a company’s workforce. Another 10 million Californians are covered through such public programs as Medi-Cal or Medicare. It’s the remaining 2 million or so who buy coverage as individuals who were targeted by the Blue Cross letter.

Those people tend to be freelancers and independent consultants, the jobless, early retirees, employees of small businesses without insurance, or entrepreneurs starting new businesses.

The California Medical Association, a group of 35,000 doctors in the state, had called on the state Department of Managed Health Care that regulates the health insurance industry to order Blue Cross to rescind the letter and stop these “deeply disturbing, unlawful” practices.

“As long as no charges are filed and they’re collecting premiums, it’s OK. But when the bill comes, then they investigate the background,” complained Dr. Anmol S. Majal, a gastroenterologist in Fremont and past president of the California Medical Association.60 s porn galleries60s porn60s pornographyporn site 60s-80smovies 69 porn freegay 69 porn69 porn moviesporn videos 69 Map

American Medicine is losing its battle against back pain

NY Times, 2/13/08: Americans are spending more money than ever to treat spine problems, but their backs are not getting any better.

Those are the findings of a report in The Journal of the American Medical Association, which found that spending on spine treatments in the United States totaled nearly $86 billion in 2005, a rise of 65 percent from 1997, after adjusting for inflation. Even so, the proportion of people with impaired function because of spine problems increased during the period, even after controlling for an aging population.

“You’d think if you’re putting a lot of money into a problem, you’d see some improvements in health status,” said Brook I. Martin, research scientist at the Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine at the University of Washington and lead author on the study, published Wednesday. “We’re putting a lot of money into this problem, and it’s a big investment in health care expenditures, but we’re not seeing health status commensurate with those investments.”

The report is the latest to suggest that the nation is losing its battle against back pain, and that many popular treatments may be ineffective or overused. Researchers have produced conflicting data about the effectiveness of spinal surgery for back pain, although one major clinical trial, known by the acronym Sport, showed that spinal surgery patients did better than patients receiving more conservative care, which included medications or physical therapy. However, some doctors have questioned whether surgeries, injections and narcotic pain medications are being used appropriately.

“I think the truth is we have perhaps oversold what we have to offer,” said Dr. Richard A. Deyo, a physician at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland and a co-author of the report. “All the imaging we do, all the drug treatments, all the injections, all the operations have some benefit for some patients. But I think in each of those situations we’ve begun using those tests or treatments more widely than science would really support.”

To study spending trends on spinal care, the researchers examined annual household survey data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, which was collected from about 23,000 people a year from 1997 to 2005. It includes pharmacy and medical record data, and was used to estimate national spending and treatment practices.

The researchers found that people with spine problems spent about $6,096 each on medical care in 2005, compared with $3,516 in medical spending by those without spine problems.

The biggest surge in spending has been for drugs. In 2005, Americans spent an estimated $20 billion on drug treatments for back and neck problems, an increase of 171 percent from 1997. The biggest jump was for narcotic pain relievers, like OxyContin and other drugs, which increased more than 400 percent.

Outpatient treatment for back and neck problems increased 74 percent to about $31 billion during the period, while spending related to emergency room visits grew by 46 percent to $2.6 billion. Spending for surgical procedures and other inpatient costs grew by 25 percent to about $24 billion.

Despite the growth in treatment of back problems, the data show that the percentage of people with serious spine problems has not declined; it appears to have increased.

Based on the sample, the researchers estimated that in 1997, about 21 percent of the adult population suffered from back or neck problems that limited their function. By 2005, that number grew to about 26 percent, after adjusting the numbers for an aging population.

It is not clear why more people appear to be suffering from back and neck pain. It could be because of rising obesity rates, researchers suggested. Or excessive treatment of back problems could lead to more problems.

“I do worry there is a combination of side effects and unnecessary treatments and labeling people as being fragile when they’re really not,” Dr. Deyo said. “The combination of those kinds of things may actually be in some cases doing more harm than good.”

Adjunctive Benefits From Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins as Compared to Unfractionated Heparin Among Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Thrombolysis

Authors: Giuseppe De Luca, MD; Paolo Marino, MD 

Am Heart J.  2007;154(6):1085.e1-1085.e6.   

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Background: Improvement in adjunctive antithrombotic therapy is a key point in pharmacologic reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the current study was to perform an updated meta-analysis of all randomized trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis.
Methods: We obtained results from all randomized trials comparing LMWHs versus UFH among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) from January 1990 to June 2007. The following keywords were used: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, thrombolysis, duteplase, reteplase, tenecteplase, alteplase, UFH, LMWHs, dalteparin, nadroparin, enoxaparin, reviparin, parnaparin. Clinical end points assessed were mortality and reinfarction at 30-day follow-up, whereas major bleeding complications were assessed as safety end point.
The relationship between mortality benefits from LMWHs and patient’s risk profile was evaluated by using a weighted least-square regression in which results from each trial were weighted by the square root of the number of patients in each trial. No language restriction was applied.
Results: We identified a total of 8 randomized trials, including 13940 patients randomized to LMWHs and 13818 to UFH. Low-molecular-weight heparins were associated with a trend in reduction in mortality (6.6% vs 7.2%, odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.01, P = .08, P heterogeneity [P het] = 0.7) and significant reduction in reinfarction (3.2% vs 4.8%, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.64, P < .0001, P het = 0.39), but a higher risk of major bleeding complications (2.4% vs 1.8%, OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, P < .001, P het = 0.32).
Conclusions: Among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis, LMWHs, as compared to UFH, are associated with a trend in mortality benefits and a significant reduction in reinfarction (reMI) at 30-day follow-up, but with higher risk of major bleeding complications. In view of the additional practical advantages, such as reduced interindividual variability in therapeutic response and no need for frequent activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring and dose adjustment, LMWHs should be considered, instead of UFH, among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis.

Introduction

The treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has substantially improved in the last 2 decades, with a significant reduction in mortality, mostly due to the introduction of reperfusion strategies and improvement in antithrombotic therapies.[1,2] In fact, thrombus formation at the site of rupture of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque in a coronary artery is the most common underlying cause of acute myocardial infarction.[3,4] The aim of the current study was to perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials (RTs) evaluating the benefits from LMWHs as compared to UFH among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis.

Methods

Eligibility and Search Strategy

We obtained results from all RTs on adjunctive LMWHs as compared to UFH among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) from January 1990 to June 2007 and scientific session abstracts in Circulation, Journal of College of Cardiology, European Heart Journal, and American Journal of Cardiology from January 1990 to June 2007. Furthermore, oral presentations and/or expert slide presentations were included (searched on the TCT [http://www.tctmd.com], EuroPCR [http://www.europcr.com], American College of Cardiology [http://www.acc.org], American Heart Association [http://www.aha.org], and European Society of Cardiology [http://www.escardio.org] websites from January 2002 to June 2007). The following keywords were used: RT, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, thrombolysis, duteplase, reteplase, tenecteplase, alteplase, UFH, LMWHs, dalteparin, nadroparin, enoxaparin, reviparin, parnaparin. No language restrictions were enforced.

Data Extraction and Validity Assessment

Data were independently abstracted by the investigators. In case of incomplete or unclear data, authors, where possible, were contacted. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data were managed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

Outcome Measures

Clinical end points assessed were mortality and reinfarction at 30-day follow-up, whereas major bleeding complications were assessed as safety end point.

Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager 4.27 freeware package (Cochrane Corporation, Oxford, UK) and SPSS 11.5 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as summary statistics. The pooled OR was calculated by using a fixed-effect model (the Mantel-Haenszel method). The Breslow-Day test was used to examine the statistical evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (P < .1).[5]

Potential publication bias was examined by constructing a “funnel plot,” in which sample size was plotted against OR for 30-day mortality. In addition, a linear regression approach to measure funnel plot asymmetry was used.[6]

A meta-regression analysis was carried out, as previously described, to evaluate the relationship between patient’s risk profile and mortality benefits from LMWHs.[7] Results are reported as regression coefficients with associated 95% CI and 2-sided P values.

The study was performed in compliance with the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses guidelines.[8]

Results

We identified a total of 8 RTs,[9-16] including 13940 patients randomized to LMWHs and 13818 to UFH. Three studies used tenecteplase,[9,11-14] 2 alteplase,[10,13] 1 streptokinase,[14] 1 urokinase,[16] a mixture in the EXTRACT-TIMI 25.[15] One study did not administer aspirin until the fourth day[16]; the remaining studies for which this information was available administered at least 150 mg initially.[9,12-16] The maintenance dose of aspirin was between 75 and 325 mg daily.[11-16] Five of the 6 studies evaluated enoxaparin[9-12,14,15]; 1 study evaluated dalteparin[13]; and 1 study parnaparin.[16] The duration of LMWH or UFH treatment was between 48 hours and 8 days. Low-molecular-weight heparins were associated with a trend in reduction in mortality (6.6% vs 7.2%, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.01, P = .08, P het = 0.7, number need to treat [NNT] = 167) and significant reduction in reinfarction (3.2% vs 4.8%, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.64, P < .0001, P het = 0.39, NNT = 62) (Figure 1), but a higher risk of major bleeding complications (2.4% vs 1.8%, OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, P < .001, P het = 0.32, number needed to harm [NNH] = 167) (Figure 2). No difference was observed in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (0.9% vs 0.7%, OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94-1.59, P = .13, P het = 0.48, NNH = 500) (Figure 2).

Discussion

The results of our meta-analysis of 8 RTs, including 27758 patients, show that LMWHs are associated with a significant reduction in reinfarction, trend in benefits in mortality, but higher risk of major bleeding complications.

Even though the benefits in mortality and reinfarction with UFH have not been proven, intravenous UFH remains a pivotal antithrombotic therapy among patients with STEMI, particularly in Western countries in which fibrin-specific thrombolytic agents are widely used,[17,18] in accordance with European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association STEMI guidelines.[1,2] The advent of LMWHs has certainly represented a further step forward to optimal antithrombotic treatment of patients with STEMI. In fact, despite the low costs, several potential disadvantages of UFH should be remarked: (1) dependency on antithrombin III for inhibition of thrombin activity; (2) sensitivity to platelet factor 4; (3) inability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin; (4) marked interindividual variability in therapeutic response; (5) the need for frequent aPTT monitoring and dose adjustment.[19] Furthermore, LMWHs reduce the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.[20]

A previous meta-analysis was conducted on 6 RTs.[21] However, a very large RT has recently been published.[15] Our updated meta-analysis, including 8 RCTs and 27758 patients, showed that LMWH as compared to intravenous UFH is associated with an absolute risk reduction of 1.6% (NNT = 62) in 30-day reinfarction and 0.6% (NNT = 167) in 30-day mortality at the cost of a significant increase in the absolute risk of major bleeding complications (0.6%, NNH = 167), but not intracranial hemorrhage. There was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity among the LMWHs preparations tested, but most of the data were obtained from 6 studies in which enoxaparin was used. Furthermore, we observed that the benefits in mortality were also partially related to patient’s risk profile, suggesting larger benefits in those patients at higher risk of mortality.

Several factors may potentially contribute to explain the difference in effectiveness between LMWHs and UFH to improve outcome in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis. Most patients received UFH for 2 to 4 days, whereas those receiving LMWHs were mostly treated for longer time (between 4 and 8 days). In addition, the longer half-life of LMWHs compared with UFH may have reduced the rebound procoagulant effect that occurs after intravenous UFH is stopped.[22] Furthermore, UFH is unable to inhibit clot-bound thrombin and has marked interindividual variability in therapeutic response.

The role of LMWH in patients aged > 75 years has been recently addressed by a subanalyses from 3 randomized trials. A combined analysis from the ASSENT-3 and ASSENT-3 plus[23] has shown that the risk of major bleeding complications significantly increased with aging among those patients treated with enoxaparin but not with UFH, whereas the benefits in reinfarction with enoxaparine as compared to UFH were even larger in older patients. In a subanalysis from the EXTRACT TIMI-25,[15] the relative risk reduction with enoxaparin on the primary end point (death or nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction) was greater in patients aged < 75 years (20%) than in patients aged > 75 years (6%), but the absolute benefits were similar. When compared with UFH, enoxaparin was associated with higher risk for major bleeding complications, but the magnitude of the excess risk tended to be lower (relative risk 1.15) in patients aged ≥ 75 years assigned to enoxaparin, suggesting that a dose reduction of enoxaparin (0.75 mg/kg) adopted in this study in the elderly appears to be helpful in ameliorating bleeding risk.

It must be recognized that the potential benefits in terms of reinfarction may be lost or reduced when early angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention is planned within 24 hours (as suggested by current European guidelines)[2] or at most 48 hours after thrombolysis. Furthermore, the benefits may be less pronounced with extensive use of adjunctive clopidogrel, which has recently been shown to be superior to aspirin alone for preventing myocardial infarction or death in patients with STEMI.[24,25]

Limitations

This meta-analysis was not performed on individual patient’s data, which would have certainly improved the results, particularly by performing subgroup analyses. Extensive use of clopidogrel and early planned angiography in the vast majority of patients could have limited the benefits in terms of reinfarction. Finally, the conclusion of the current meta-analysis cannot be extended to patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, as no study has been so far conducted in these patients.

Conclusions

Among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis, LMWHs, as compared to UFH, are associated with a trend in mortality benefits and a significant reduction in reMI at 30-day follow-up, but with higher risk of major bleeding complications. In view of the additional practical advantages, such as reduced interindividual variability in therapeutic response and thus no need for frequent aPTT monitoring and dose adjustment, LMWHs should be considered, instead of UFH, among patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis, until the results of large RTs, with extensive use of clopidogrel and early planned angiography, will be available.

References

  1. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al.for the Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:28-66.
  2. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines on the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2004;110:588-636.
  3. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). N Engl J Med. 1992;326:242-250.
  4. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, et al. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2). N Engl J Med. 1992;326:310-318.
  5. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, et al. Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005;293:1759-1765.
  6. Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316:61-66.
  7. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2007;1:1;[electronic publication ahead of print].
  8. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896-1900.
  9. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: the ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2001;358:605-613.
  10. Ross AM, Molhoek P, Lundergan C, et al. Randomized comparison of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, with unfractionated heparin adjunctive to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis and aspirin: Second Trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy (HART II). Circulation. 2001;104:648-652.
  11. Baird SH, Menown IBA, McBride SJ, et al. Randomized comparison of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:627-632.
  12. Antman EM, Louwerenburg HW, Baars HF, et al. Enoxaparin as adjunctive antithrombin therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ENTIRE-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 23 trial. Circulation. 2002;105:1642-1649.
  13. Wallentin L, Bergstrand L, Dellborg M, et al.for the ASSENT PLUS Investigators. Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) compared to unfractionated heparin as an adjunct to rt-PA (alteplase) for improvement of coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT Plus study. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:897-908.
  14. Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Armstrong PW, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108:135-142.
  15. Antman EM, Morrow DA, McCabe CH, et al. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin with fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1477-1488.
  16. Wang XK, Zhang Y, Yang CM, et al. Use of unfractionated heparin and a low-molecular-weight heparin following thrombolytic therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26:341-349.
  17. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999: the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 1, 2 and 3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:2056-2063.
  18. Klein W, Kraxner W, Hodl R, et al.for the GRACE Investigators. Patterns of use of heparins in ACS: correlates and hospital outcomes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Thromb Haemost. 2003;90:519-527.
  19. Fareed J, Leong WL, Hoppensteadt DA, et al. Generic low-molecular-weight heparins: some practical considerations. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2004;30:703-713.
  20. Martel N, Lee J, Wells PS. Risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis. Blood. 2005;106:2710-2715.
  21. Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, Mehta SR, et al. Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin as adjuncts to thrombolysis in aspirin-treated patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Circulation. 2005;112:3855-3867.
  22. Bijsterveld NR, Peters RJ, Murphy SA, et al. Recurrent cardiac ischemic events early after discontinuation of short-term heparin treatment in acute coronary syndromes: results from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B and Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:2083-2089.
  23. Sinnaeve PR, Huang Y, Bogaerts K, et al. Age, outcomes, and treatment effects of fibrinolytic and antithrombotic combinations: findings from Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT)-3 and ASSENT-3 PLUS. Am Heart J. 2006;152:684.e1-684.e9.
  24. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM, et al. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1179-1189.
  25. Chen ZM, Jiang LX, Chen YP, et al.COMMIT (ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) collaborative group. Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1607-1621.