Archive for January, 2009

OMNI Postings of 2/1/09

Jon and Dan are in a mental institution which has an annual contest that picks two of the best patients and gives them two questions. If they answer correctly, they are released.
Jon is called into the doctor’s office first. The doctor says, “Jon, what would happen if I poked out one of your eyes?”
Jon says, “I’d be half blind.”
“That’s correct. What would happen if I poked out both your eyes?”
“I’d be completely blind.” The doctor tells him that he is free to go. On Jon’s way out he tells Dan the questions and answers.
The doctor asks Dan, “What would happen if I cut off one of your ears?”
Dan says, “I’d be half blind.”
The doctor, slightly puzzled, continues, “What would happen if I cut off both your ears?”
“I’d be completely blind.”
“Dan, how can you explain that you’d be blind?” asks the doctor.
“Well,” replies Dan, “my hat would fall over my eyes.”
But I digress…
1)  Here’s a derm quiz for you. No, it’s not secondary syphilis, although when stumped, it’s  good test to order. 
2)  This is an abstract from Acad Emerg Med.  The question of the day is whether you can have evidence of brain herniation on CT and still have no objective neurological findings.  Did someone say, “Sure. If you were born in Michigan.”  ?Well, you’re wrong.  In this study, 161 patients had CT-diagnosed frank herniation and 3 (1.9%) had no neurological deficit. Of 91 patients with significant brain shift but no herniation, 4 (4.4%) had no neurological deficit.
3)  Have you ever ordered rectal ASA when a chest pain patient couldn’t tolerate oral ASA?  I never did.  I was taught never to do a rectal on an MI patient.  Besides, they have enough problems without someone shoving a digit up there.  Anyway, rectal ASA is the route that’s used at this one hospital when PO is not tolerated. Did it work as well?  Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The rectal suppository provided significantly more salicylic acid into the blood than the oral tablets over 90 minutes. No statistical difference was noted between oral and rectal administration from baseline to 30 minutes. However, mean salicylic acid levels from the rectal suppository were statistically higher than from the oral tablets from 30 to 60 minutes  and from 60 to 90 minutes.
4)  This snippet was submitted by one of our colleagues.  Vitamin D may prevent dementia in addition to being beneficial for bones, cataracts, and infidelity.

Gout: Acute Therapy

Click on Gout: Update on Therapy for full text published in Consultant Journal and authored by  GE Ruoff, MDM of Michigan State University

“TREATMENT OF ACUTE GOUT

The earlier anti-inflammatory treatment is started, the more rapidly the acute flare will subside. Ensure adequate dosing, and treat until the flare has resolved. Once all overt signs of inflammation are gone, continue and then taper treatment for at least 2 or 3 days. The choice of an antiinflammatory agent depends on patient age and comorbidities.2

NSAIDs. In otherwise healthy patients without significant heart or GI disease or a history of aspirin allergy, NSAIDs are preferred. In more than 90% of patients, attacks resolve within 5 to 8 days of starting therapy.1 Adverse events associated with NSAIDs limit their use. These include worsening of renal function, fluid retention, gastric problems, hepatotoxicity, and impaired cognitive function. In patients with known renal impairment, reduce the NSAID dosage and monitor renal function.3

Colchicine. This agent works best when administered within 24 to 48 hours of the onset of an acute attack. Its effectiveness is reduced once an acute attack has persisted for a few days. Colchicine diminishes symptoms by disrupting chemotaxis and phagocytosis of inflammatory cells. It does not reduce the accumulation of monosodium urate deposits and joint damage in chronic gout, and it should not be used long-term in chronic gout.1,3 Instruct patients to begin taking colchicine at the first sign or symptom of an acute flare to avert a full-blown attack.

Most patients who take colchicine at therapeutic doses experience symptoms of GI toxicity, such as diarrhea, before symptoms abate. Long-term effects include myopathy, but this is rare. Select alternative agents for elderly patients and for those who are receiving dialysis.3 Use colchicine cautiously in patients with liver or renal disease; adjust the dose for those with renal impairment.3

Corticosteroids. Intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, and oral corticosteroids have been effective in acute gout.1 They are especially useful when NSAIDs or colchicine are contraindicated.3 When given for a short period, corticosteroids are safe. For patients with diabetes, monitor glucose levels and be prepared to increase insulin temporarily….”

1

Eyelid Papules

For several years, a 43-year-old woman has noticed an increasing number of discrete, asymptomatic papules around her eyelids. Well?

1

The papules are syringomas, benign sweat gland tumors that are generally confined to the eyelids. Typically, lesions first appear during the third or fourth decade and slowly become more numerous, as in the 63-year-old patient shown here. They have no malignant potential and may be removed surgically for cosmetic reasons.

What are these circular lesions? Huh?

For several months, a 59-year-old woman has had numerous asymptomatic lesions on her arms and legs. During this period, she has not been exposed to the sun and has taken no new medications.

1

What does this look like to you?

A. Granuloma annulare.
B. Subacute lupus erythematosus.
C. Tinea corporis.
D. Psoriasis.
E. Erythema annulare centrifugum.

1

Answer:  The patient has granuloma annulare, A, a condition that has no known cause. The rash persists for months or years before spontaneously involuting, and it is refractory to most treatments. Subacute lupus erythematosus, tinea corporis, and psoriasis all present with scale and are usually pruritic. Erythema annulare centrifugum manifests with trailing scale.

Rectal ASA in MIs

A Comparison of Salicylic Acid Levels in Normal Subjects after Rectal versus Oral Dosing
Roger Maalouf, MD, Mark Mosley, MD, K. James Kallail, PhD, Karen M. Kramer, PhD, and Gaurav Kumar, MD, MPH
From the Department of Internal Medicine (RM, MM, KJK, KMK, GK) and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (KMK), University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS; and Emergency Services, PA, Wesley Medical Center (MM), Wichita, KS. Dr. Maalouf is currently with the Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine–Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL.
Address for correspondence and reprints: K. James Kallail, PhD; e-mail: kkallail@kumc.edu.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:157–161 © 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ABSTRACT

Objectives: The common practice is to use 162 mg of aspirin orally in the emergency department (ED) for patients presenting with myocardial infarction. If the patient cannot take aspirin orally in the authors’ facility, then 600 mg of aspirin is given rectally. However, no strong evidence exists as to whether the oral and rectal doses provide equivalent risk protection. The authors hypothesized that the salicylic acid levels for orally and rectally administered aspirin will not be similar, because of the different dosages used and the different routes of administration.

Methods: The study sample consisted of healthy, nonpregnant, adult volunteers without active illness, who did not take any medication regularly. Each subject served as his or her own control to account for any confounding factors. The study was conducted on 2 days, separated by a 1-week washout period. On the first day, 162 mg of oral aspirin was chewed and swallowed. Salicylic acid levels were obtained at baseline (i.e., before taking the aspirin) and then 30, 60, and 90 minutes after dosing. The 600-mg aspirin suppository was self-administered 1 week later with a sample for laboratory measures again drawn at baseline and then 30, 60, and 90 minutes after dosing.

Results: Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The rectal suppository provided significantly more salicylic acid into the blood than the oral tablets over 90 minutes (p < 0.001). No statistical difference was noted between oral and rectal administration from baseline to 30 minutes (p > 0.05). However, mean salicylic acid levels from the rectal suppository were statistically higher than from the oral tablets from 30 to 60 minutes (p < 0.001) and from 60 to 90 minutes (p = 0.002). More than 60% of the subjects had an increasing salicylic acid level response over time to the rectal suppository. The salicylic acid level response to the oral administration was more evenly divided between those subjects whose salicylic acid levels peaked quickly and then fell or held steady (33%), those whose salicylic acid levels increased over time (29%), and those whose salicylic acid levels were measureable only after 60 minutes (25%). Although not statistically significant, these differences in group distributions for the type of salicylic acid level response between oral and rectal doses suggested the possibility of a rectal advantage.

Conclusions: Whether the higher salicylic acid levels and faster absorption of the rectal aspirin translate into better clinical outcomes is unknown and cannot be concluded from our study. Previous evidence, however, has shown that 162 mg of aspirin chewed and swallowed provided lower mortality in patients presenting with myocardial infarction. Our results suggested the rectal administration of a 600-mg suppository provides sufficient levels of salicylic acid within 90 minutes to meet or exceed that of oral aspirin.

Brain Herniation with a Normal Neurologic Exam?

Can Patients with Brain Herniation on Cranial Computed Tomography Have a Normal Neurologic Exam?
Marc A. Probst, MD, Larry J. Baraff, MD, Jerome R. Hoffman, MA, MD, Allan B. Wolfson, MD, Ariel J. Ourian, BS, and William R. Mower, MD, PhD

From the University of California, Los Angeles Emergency Medicine Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (MAP, LJB, JRH, AJO, WRM), Los Angeles, CA; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh (ABW), Pittsburgh, PA.
Address for correspondence: William R. Mower, MD, PhD; wmower@ucla.edu.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:145–150 © 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ABSTRACT

Objectives: Herniation of the brain outside of its normal intracranial spaces is assumed to be accompanied by clinically apparent neurologic dysfunction. The authors sought to determine if some patients with brain herniation or significant brain shift diagnosed by cranial computed tomography (CT) might have a normal neurologic examination.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) II cranial CT database compiled from a multicenter, prospective, observational study of all patients for whom cranial CT scanning was ordered in the emergency department (ED). Clinical information including neurologic examination was prospectively collected on all patients prior to CT scanning. Using the final cranial CT radiology reports from participating centers, all CT scans were classified into three categories: frank herniation, significant shift without frank herniation, and minimal or no shift, based on predetermined explicit criteria. These reports were concatenated with clinical information to form the final study database.

Results: A total of 161 patients had CT-diagnosed frank herniation; 3 (1.9%) had no neurologic deficit. Of 91 patients with significant brain shift but no herniation, 4 (4.4%) had no neurologic deficit.

Conclusions: A small number of patients may have normal neurologic status while harboring significant brain shift or brain herniation on cranial CT.

Peds: Diversion and Death

Ambulance Diversion as a Proxy for Emergency Department Crowding: The Effect on Pediatric Mortality in a Metropolitan Area 

Rohit P. Shenoi, MD, Long Ma, MS, Jennifer Jones, MS, Mary Frost ,RN, BSN, Munseok Seo, Dr PH, and Charles E. Begley, PhD

From the Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine (RPS, LM, JJ), Houston, TX; the Emergency Center, Texas Children’s Hospital (MF), Houston, TX; and the School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center (MS, CEB), Houston, TX.
Address for correspondence and reprints: Rohit Shenoi, MD; e-mail: rshenoi@bcm.tmc.edu.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:116–123 © 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective was to determine the prevalence of emergency department (ED) ambulance diversion among Houston pediatric hospitals and its association with mortality of pediatric patients.

Methods: Hospital diversion and patient data between August 2002 and December 2004 were used to examine the impact of diversion on mortality of children under age 18 years. Patients were assumed to be exposed to ED crowding if diversion and admission or ED arrival times overlapped. Univariate and logistic regression were performed to determine if diversion was associated with mortality while controlling for age, illness severity, injury, and transfer status.

Results: Mean hospital diversion hours as a percentage of operating hours were 10.58 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9). Overall, of 63,780 admissions, there were 4,095 (6.4%) children admitted during diversion. Fewer severely ill patients were admitted during diversion than nondiversion times (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 0.78). The presence of diversion was protective for mortality (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.77) in bivariate analysis. Mortality was associated with presence of major or extreme illness (OR = 60.7; 95% CI = 45.2 to 81.5), injury (OR=1.7; 95% CI = 1.4 to 2.1), and transfer status (OR = 6.3; 95% CI = 5.4 to 7.3). Using conditional logistic regression, major or extreme illness (OR = 50.7; 95% CI = 37.7 to 68.3), injury (OR 3.7; 95% CI = 2.9 to 4.7), and transfer (OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 2.2, 3.2) were associated with mortality, but diversion did not show any association with mortality. After combining ED and inpatient deaths, no association between diversion and mortality was observed.

Conclusions: Hospital diversion due to ED crowding is common in pediatrics. The authors found no evidence of an association between diversion and ED and inpatient pediatric mortality.

AECOPD: Treatment different depending on race?

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emergency Care for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chu-Lin Tsai MD ScD and Carlos A. Camargo Jr MD DrPH

From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School (CLT, CAC), Boston, MA.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Chu-Lin Tsai; e-mail: cltsai@post.harvard.edu.
Copyright © 2009 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:108–115 © 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective was to investigate racial and ethnic differences in emergency care for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods: The authors performed a prospective multicenter cohort study involving 24 emergency departments (EDs) in 15 U.S. states. Using a standard protocol, consecutive ED patients with AECOPD were interviewed, their charts reviewed, and 2-week telephone follow-ups were completed.

Results: Among 330 patients, 218 (66%) were white, 84 (25%) were African American, and 28 (8%) were Hispanic. A quarter of the 24 EDs cared for 59% of all minority patients. Compared with white patients, African American and Hispanic patients were more likely to be uninsured or with Medicaid (19, 49, and 52%, respectively; p < 0.001), were less likely to have a primary care provider (93, 81, and 82%, respectively; p = 0.005), and had more frequent ED visits in the past year (medians = 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p = 0.002). In the unadjusted analyses, minority patients were less likely to receive diagnostic procedures, more likely to receive systemic corticosteroids in the ED, less likely to be admitted, and more likely to have a relapse. After adjustment for patient and ED characteristics, these many racial and ethnic differences in quality of care were nearly completely eliminated.

Conclusions: Despite pronounced racial and ethnic differences in stable COPD, all racial and ethnic groups received comparable quality of emergency care for AECOPD and had similar short-term outcomes.

Ketamine

Pediatric Procedural Sedation with Ketamine: Time to Discharge after Intramuscular versus Intravenous Administration

Preeti Ramaswamy, MBBS, Franz E. Babl, MD, MPH, Conor Deasy, MS BCH, and Lisa N. Sharwood, MPH

From the Emergency Department, Royal Children’s Hospital (PR, FEB, CD, LNS); the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (FEB, LNS); and the University of Melbourne(FEB), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Address for correspondence and reprints: Franz E. Babl, MD, MPH; e-mail: franz.babl@rch.org.au.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2009; 16:101–107 © 2008 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
ABSTRACT

Objectives: Ketamine is an attractive agent for pediatric procedural sedation. There are limited data on time to discharge comparing intramuscular (IM) vs. intravenous (IV) ketamine. The authors set out to determine whether IM or IV ketamine leads to quicker discharge from the emergency department (ED) and how side effect profiles compare.

Methods: All patients who had received ketamine IM or IV at a tertiary children’s hospital ED during the 3-year study period (2004–2007) were identified. Prospective sedation registry data, retrospective medical records, and administrative data were reviewed for drug dosages, use of additional agents, time of drug administration to discharge, total ED time (triage to discharge), and adverse events. A subgroup analysis for patients requiring five or fewer sutures (short suture group) was performed.

Results: A total of 229 patients were enrolled (60% male) with median age of 2.8 years (IQR =1.8–4.3 years) and median weight of 15.7 kg (range = 8.7–74 kg). Ketamine was most frequently employed for laceration repair (80%) and foreign body removal (9%). Overall, 48% received ketamine IM and 52% received it IV. In the short-suture subgroup, 52% received ketamine IM, while 48% received it IV. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined time from drug administration to patient discharge as 21 minutes shorter for IV compared with IM administration, adjusted for age and number of additional doses (R2 = −0.35; 95% CI = −0.5 to −0.19; p < 0.001). Total time in the ED (triage to discharge) comparing IV versus IM administration, adjusting for age and gender and number of additional doses, was not significantly different (p = 0.16). In the short-suture subgroup, time to discharge from administration was also shorter in the IV ketamine group (R2 = −0.454; 95%CI = −0.66 to −0.25; p < 0.001) but similar for total time in ED (p = 0.16). Overall, adverse events occurred in 35% (95% CI = 27% to 45%) of the IM group and 20% (95% CI = 13% to 28%) of the IV group (p = 0.01). Only one patient required brief bag-mask ventilation.

Conclusions: In this institution, time from drug injection to discharge was shorter in the IV compared to IM ketamine group, both overall and for the short-suture group. However, time from triage to discharge was similar.

Coincidence that the word dementia starts with the letter D?

A new large-scale senior population study has found that a lack of vitamin D in the elderly could be linked to cognitive impairment. The study prompted researchers to suggest vitamin D supplementation as a possible means of reducing the risk of dementia. The findings from the researchers revealed that compared to those with optimum levels of vitamin D, those with the lowest levels were more than twice as likely to be cognitively impaired.

Source: Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Cognitive Impairment. 

OMNI Postings of 1/31/09

A blonde wanted to sell her car, but couldn’t find any buyers. She called her friend for advice, and her friend asked her how many miles she had on her car.
“235,000 miles.” Her friend told her that was the problem.  But the blonde’s friend told her that her brother is a mechanic and could put back the miles to whatever she wanted. So the blonde went to the mechanic and told him to put the miles at 40,000. Two days later the blond’s friend asked her if she sold the car since her brother dropped the miles.  The blonde told her, “Why would I sell the car? There are only 40,000 miles on it!”
But I digress…
1)  They did a study and found out that the vast majority of hospitalized patients don’t  know the names of their doctors.  What’s worst is that after they receive their caths and intubations and such, they don’t even know the names of their spouses.
2)  This is a news story about researchers who have mixed bone cement with colistin to avoid infections in combat soldiers with compound fractures.  Anyway, it works in mice.
3)  This is the latest CDC  report about their investigation into the peanut butter crisis.  The latest news is that the Feds are pursuing a criminal investigation.  Making sure that everything is on the up and up is the law firm of  Blagojevic, Spitzer & Madoff.
4)  This is a recent USA Today story about the amount of outpatient surgery that’s going on.  The rate of visits to free-standing surgical centers tripled from 1996 to 2006, to 15 million surgeries and other procedures a year, according to a report from the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Surgeries at free-standing centers now make up 42% of all outpatient operations, the report shows.
Arizona?  Pittsburgh?
Paul R.

Bone Cement + Colistin

Click on Fighting Infections in Compound Fractures for the full story.

HealthDay, 1/29/09

“A combination of bone cement and antibiotics may help fight dangerous infections that can develop in compound (open) fractures suffered by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a study conducted by a team of orthopedic, military and pharmaceutical researchers.

A bacteria called Acinetobacter baumannii is common in the Middle East and present in more than 30 percent of soldiers recovering from open fractures in field hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan. This kind of infection can lead to amputation, according to background information in the study…

In this study, [the researchers] used bone cement infused with an antibiotic called colistin — one of the last-resort antibiotics for drug-resistant A. baumannii — to treat mice infected with samples of the bacteria taken from soldiers wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan. After 19 days, only 29.2 percent of the mice still had detectable levels of A. baumannii.

The study was published Jan. 27 in the Journal of Orthopedic Research…”

In-Patients Can’t Name Their Doctors

Click on Who The Hell Are You And Why Are You Billing Me? for the full story.

NY Times, 1/30/09

“…Researchers at the University of Chicago interviewed 2,807 adults admitted to the school’s hospital over a 15-month period. The patients were asked about the roles of the various physicians attending to them and to name the doctors on those teams. Medical teams consisted of three to four people, including medical students, residents and attending physicians.

Some 75 percent of the patients were unable to name a single doctor assigned to their care. Of the 25 percent who responded with a name, only 40 percent were correct. Those patients who claimed to understand the roles of their doctors were more likely to correctly identify at least one of their physicians…

Whether patients need to be familiar with hospital staff is open to debate, according to some experts. “Do you really need to know who your doctor is, or is it more important to know some processes that will help you get at the information you need?” said Dr. Ernest Moy, medical officer at the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

In the new study, patients able to name one of their physicians also were more likely to be unsatisfied with their care, the researchers found…”

OMNI Postings of 1/30/09

Veteran Pillsbury spokesman Pop N. Fresh died yesterday of a severe yeast infection. He was 71.
Known to friends as Brown-n-Serve, Fresh was an avid gardener and tennis player. Fresh was buried in one of the largest funeral ceremonies in recent years. Dozens of celebrities turned out including Mrs. Butterworth, the California Raisins, Hungry Jack, Aunt Jemima, Betty Crocker, the Hostess Twinkies, and Skippy. The graveside was piled high with flours as longtime friend Aunt Jemima delivered the eulogy, describing Fresh as a man who “never knew how much he was kneaded.”
Fresh rose quickly in show business, but his later life was filled with many turnovers. He was not considered a very smart cookie, wasting much of his dough on half-baked schemes — conned by those who buttered him up.
Still, even as a crusty old man, he was a roll model for millions. Fresh is survived by his second wife. They have two children and another bun in the oven. The funeral was held at 350 for about 20 minutes.
But I digress…
1)  Here is a case report of a fellow who had a ruptured right diaphragm resulting in a hepatic voyage northward.  It’s a rare entity.  Nice images.  The only clue to the diagnosis is a high-riding right diaphragm.
2)  This came from a recent LA Times.  The ER docs of California, sun-tanned & mellow, are initiating a class action lawsuit against the State.  Why?  Because they can’t get their double latte mocha cappuccino while at work?  No.  It’s because California’s overstretched emergency healthcare system — which ranks last in the country for emergency care access — is on the verge of collapse unless more funding is provided.
3)  When a car runs over someone while backing up, it’s called a “backover.”  The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that 221 people were killed in 2007 by backing-up vehicles, and 14,000 were injured. Ninety-nine of the deaths and 2,000 of the injuries involved children age 14 and under.
4)  Here is a MMWR map showing the over 500 cases of Salmonella-PB cases state-by-state.  Ohio continues to lead the list and Michigan is up there too but not like Ohio.
5)  This is an abstract of a study showing that hospitals that supported IT had fewer deaths (15% decrease in the adjusted odds of fatal hospitalizations), fewer  complications and the costs were lower.
Paul R.

MMWR: On the Great Peanut Butter Crisis

Click on Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Infections Associated with Peanut Butter and Peanut Butter–Containing Products — United States, 2008–2009 for the source and more complete data

[Edited] On November 25, 2008, an epidemiologic assessment began of a growing cluster of Salmonella serotype Typhimurium isolates that shared the same pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern in PulseNet.* As of January 28, 2009, 529 persons from 43 states (Figure 1) and one person from Canada had been reported infected with the outbreak strain. This report is an interim summary of results from ongoing epidemiologic studies and recall and control activities by CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and state and local public health agencies. Confirmed, reported onset of illness dates have ranged from September 1, 2008, to January 16, 2009. A total of 116 patients were reported hospitalized, and the infection might have contributed to eight deaths. Sequential case-control studies have indicated significant associations between illness and consumption of any peanut butter (matched odds ratio [mOR] = 2.53), and specific brands of prepackaged peanut butter crackers (mOR = 12.25), but no association with national brand jarred peanut butter sold in grocery stores. Epidemiologic and laboratory findings indicate that peanut butter and peanut paste produced at one plant are the source of the outbreak. These products also are ingredients in many foods produced and distributed by other companies. This outbreak highlights the complexities of “ingredient-driven” outbreaks and the importance of rapid outbreak detection and investigation. Consumers are advised to discard and not eat products that have been recalled (Box).

Initial Outbreak Investigation

 

On November 10, 2008, CDC’s PulseNet staff noted a small and highly dispersed multistate cluster of 13 S. Typhimurium isolates with an unusual PFGE pattern (XbaI PFGE pattern JPXX01.1818) reported from 12 states. On November 25, CDC’s OutbreakNet team, working with state and local partners, began an epidemiologic assessment of that cluster, which had increased to 35 isolates. On December 2, CDC and state and local partners began an assessment of a second cluster of 41 S. Typhimurium isolates. The PFGE patterns of the second cluster (XbaI pattern JPXX01.0459/JPXX01.1825) were very similar to the patterns in the first cluster and were first noted by PulseNet on November 24, as a cluster of 27 isolates that had subsequently increased to 41 isolates. None of these patterns were seen previously in the PulseNet S. Typhimurium database. Testing with a second PFGE enzyme (BlnI) showed that isolates from both clusters had the same pattern (JPXA26.0462) and were indistinguishable by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, a different PulseNet subtyping method. The outbreak strain has the phage type 3 and is fully susceptible to all antimicrobials in the National Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring System panel for gram-negative bacteria. The clusters also appeared similar epidemiologically, so the two patterns were grouped together as a single outbreak strain, and the investigations were merged. The outbreak strain did not exist in the National VetNet database, which contains PFGE patterns of Salmonella isolates from raw meat and poultry products, and which CDC and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service monitor.

A case was defined as a laboratory-confirmed infection of S. Typhimurium with the outbreak strain in a person with illness onset date (or, if that date was not known, with date of isolation of Salmonella) on or after September 1, 2008. As of January 28, 2009, onset dates were known for 424 of 529 patients and ranged from September 1, 2008, to January 16, 2009 (Figure 2). Although numbers of reported cases have decreased in recent weeks, the outbreak appears to be ongoing. The median age of patients was 16 years, with an age range of <1 to 98 years; 21% were aged <5 years, and 15% were aged >59 years. Of those patients, 48% were female, 116 (22%) were hospitalized, and the infection might have contributed to eight deaths in patients aged >59 years from Minnesota (three deaths), Virginia (two), Idaho (one), North Carolina (one), and Ohio (one). A median of 16 days elapsed from the day the illness began to the date the PFGE pattern was uploaded to PulseNet (Figure 2).

The initial epidemiologic investigation included detailed open-ended interviews with patients. Patient interviews were conducted by CDC and state and local health departments using a questionnaire with approximately 300 food items. Early interviews, case reports, and identification of small clusters of cases suggested a possible association with institutional settings, although noninstitutionalized patients often reported consumption of peanut butter of multiple brands. In the initial investigation, among the most frequently reported food exposures in the 7 days before illness began, 86% of patients interviewed reported they were likely to have eaten chicken and 77% were likely to have eaten peanut butter. By comparison, the frequencies in the general public of eating these items were 85% for chicken and 59% for peanut butter in a 2006–2007 FoodNet§ food consumption survey (1).

Association with Peanut Butter

 

Many affected state health departments, including the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), conducted intensive investigations of patients infected with the outbreak strain. By December 28, MDH had learned from patient interviews that some patients infected with the outbreak strain lived or ate meals in one of at least three institutions (two long-term–care facilities and one elementary school). A review of menus and invoices by MDH and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) revealed that the institutions had a common food distributor in North Dakota, and the only food common to the three institutions was King Nut creamy peanut butter. By January 9, 2009, six additional cases in six other institutions were identified by MDH; each of those institutions had received King Nut peanut butter. An open container of King Nut peanut butter was collected from one of the institutions, a long-term–care facility, on January 5 for testing at MDA. On January 9, the MDA laboratory reported isolation of Salmonella from the King Nut peanut butter sample. This was confirmed on January 12 as S. Typhimurium of the outbreak strain.

On January 3 and 4, 2009, data were gathered for a case-control study by CDC and state and local health departments to identify whether illness was associated with eating specific food items; 70 cases and 178 controls were enrolled from 12 participating states. For this study, a case was defined as infection with the outbreak strain of S. Typhimurium in a person without preceding diarrheal illness in household members and who did not live in an institutional setting, with illness onset (or, if that date was not known, with date of isolation of Salmonella) on or after November 1, 2008. Controls recruited using a reverse-digit–dialing system were well persons, matched by case neighborhood and age category (i.e., <18 years or >18 years). Food histories were sought for the 7 days before illness onset for case-patients and 7 days before interview for controls. The median ages for case-patients and controls were 18 and 16 years, respectively. By January 9, preliminary analysis found that case-patients were significantly more likely than controls to have eaten any peanut butter in the 7 days before illness began (69% of case-patients versus 48% of controls, mOR = 2.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26–5.31, p=0.007). Illness also was associated with eating any of a group of previously frozen chicken products (i.e., chicken nuggets, chicken strips, and other breaded and stuffed chicken products) (35% of case-patients versus 14% of controls, mOR = 4.61, CI = 1.67–14.68, p=0.002), but not with any individual chicken product; no individual frozen chicken product type was reported eaten by more than 10% of case-patients. Illness was not associated with eating roasted peanuts or national brands of jarred peanut butter sold in grocery stores.

On January 16, the Connecticut Department of Public Health Laboratory isolated the outbreak strain of S. Typhimurium from a previously unopened 5-pound container of King Nut creamy peanut butter. As of January 28, 16 clusters of cases, each with at least two patients infected with the outbreak strain, were reported in five states. All clusters were in institutional facilities. King Nut was the only brand of peanut butter used in the 16 facilities.

All versions of King Nut peanut butter were produced by Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) at a single facility in Blakely, Georgia. An environmental investigation at the PCA plant was initiated by FDA and the Georgia Department of Agriculture on January 9, and a CDC epidemiologist joined the investigation team on January 10. King Nut peanut butter was distributed in bulk packaging to institutions, food service industries, and private label food companies. King Nut peanut butter was not known to be sold directly to consumers or distributed for retail sale in grocery stores.

On January 22, MDA found that a previously unopened container of King Nut peanut butter collected from the North Dakota distributor yielded Salmonella serotype Tennessee with a PFGE pattern that was indistinguishable from an outbreak strain in the multistate outbreak in 2006–2007 caused by contaminated peanut butter (2).

Association with Peanut Butter–Containing Products

 

Ongoing patient interviews indicated that many patients did not eat peanut butter in institutions, but had eaten various other peanut butter–containing products. FDA investigators reported that the PCA facility in Blakely produced peanut butter and also peanut paste (also made from ground roasted peanuts) and other peanut products, which were sold to many food companies for use as an ingredient in peanut butter–containing foods; these peanut butter–containing products are widely distributed in the United States and also are distributed in at least 23 other countries and non-U.S. territories.

During January 17–19, a second case-control study was conducted by CDC and state and local health departments to further assess these exposures; 93 cases and 399 controls were enrolled from 35 participating states. For this study, a case was defined as infection with the outbreak strain of S. Typhimurium in a person without preceding diarrheal illness in household members and who did not live in an institutional setting, with illness onset (or, if that date was not known, with date of isolation of Salmonella) on or after December 1, 2008. Controls were well persons, matched by case neighborhood and frequency matched by age groups (i.e., 0 to <6 years, 6 to <18 years, 18 to <40 years, and >40 years), who were recruited using a reverse-digit–dialing system. Controls were interviewed about the same exposure period as their matched case-patient (i.e., 7 days before the onset of the case diarrheal illness). Median ages of case-patients and controls were 17 and 39 years, respectively. Preliminary analysis found that patients were more likely than controls to have eaten prepackaged peanut butter crackers in the 7 days before illness began [73% case-patients versus 17% controls, mOR = 12.25, CI = 5.51--30.9, p<0.0001]. Two cracker brands were individually associated: Austin [43% case-patients versus 3% controls, mOR = 29.68, CI = 8.95--154.66, p<0.0001] and Keebler [20% case-patients versus 4% controls, mOR = 5.38, CI = 1.74--18.32, p=0.003] peanut butter crackers. Both Austin and Keebler brand peanut butter crackers are made at one plant, which is known to receive peanut paste from PCA. No evidence was discovered of an epidemiologic association with eating roasted peanuts.

Intact packages of Austin brand Toasty peanut butter crackers that had been purchased in the United States were obtained from the home of a patient in Canada by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Culture of a composite sample of the crackers yielded the outbreak strain of S. Typhimurium. Salmonella resembling the outbreak strain was isolated by a private laboratory from three intact packages of Austin brand Toasty peanut butter crackers obtained from a patient’s home in Oregon.

Control Measures

 

On January 9, PCA voluntarily stopped production of peanut butter and peanut paste at the Blakely, Georgia, facility. On January 10, King Nut Company issued a voluntary recall of specific lot numbers of peanut butter manufactured by PCA and distributed under King Nut and Parnell’s Pride labels. On January 16, PCA announced a voluntary recall of all peanut butter and peanut paste produced in its Blakely facility since July 1, 2008. On January 28, the PCA recall was expanded to include all peanuts and peanut products processed at this plant since January 1, 2007. In addition to peanut butter and peanut paste, the expanded recall includes dry- and oil-roasted peanuts, granulated peanuts, and peanut meal. On January 28, 2009, the facility reported that production of all peanut products had stopped. The latest information on the PCA recall can be found on the FDA website.**

To date, FDA inspectors have traced the shipments of these products to approximately 2,100 accounts and sub-accounts. FDA is working to identify additional products that might be affected and to track the ingredient supply chain of those products to remove them from the marketplace. On January 14, the Kellogg Company announced a precautionary hold on Austin and Keebler brands of peanut butter crackers, and on January 16, voluntarily recalled these products produced after July 1, 2008. As of January 28, at least 431 peanut butter–containing products had been recalled by 54 companies that had used ingredients produced by the PCA facility after July 1, 2008.††

Editorial Note:

 

Each year, approximately 40,000 laboratory- confirmed cases of Salmonella infections are reported to the National Salmonella Surveillance System.§§ S. Typhimurium is the most commonly reported serotype. In 2006, 19% of all reported salmonellosis cases for which a serotype was identified were caused by the Typhimurium serotype (3). This outbreak likely is considerably larger than the 529 laboratory-confirmed cases reported to CDC; only an estimated 3% of Salmonella infections are laboratory confirmed and reported to surveillance systems (4). During 2003–2007, an annual average of 18 outbreaks caused by S. Typhimurium were reported to CDC.¶¶ The rates of hospitalization and mortality observed in the current outbreak are typical for Salmonella, and this strain does not appear to be unusually virulent.

The epidemiologic and laboratory findings from this continuing investigation indicate that peanut butter and peanut paste produced at the PCA plant are the source of the outbreak. More specifically, the outbreak was caused by contaminated peanut butter used in institutions, and by peanut butter and peanut paste used as ingredients in food products. The second case- control study indicated a particular risk with peanut butter crackers, but this does not exonerate other peanut-containing products.

After one brand of peanut butter served in institutions was implicated by epidemiologic and laboratory evidence, the investigation was expanded to include food items that use peanut butter and peanut paste made in the same factory as ingredients in peanut butter–containing products. This was an ingredient-driven outbreak, in which a contaminated ingredient affected many different products that are distributed through various channels and consumed in various settings. Peanut butter and peanut paste are common ingredients in cookies, crackers, cereal, candy, ice cream, pet treats, and other foods. Mass food distribution can lead to widely distributed nationwide outbreaks. The large number of products and brands recalled already, and the large quantities of some products recalled, makes this one of the largest recalls in the United States.

This is the second outbreak caused by contaminated peanut butter in the United States. The first outbreak was caused by contamination of a commercially distributed brand of peanut butter with S. Tennessee during 2006–2007 (2). Only one other previous outbreak associated with peanut butter has been reported; an outbreak of Salmonella serotype Mbandaka infections in Australia in 1996 (5).

The detection of a S. Tennessee isolate with a PFGE pattern that is indistinguishable from the 2006–2007 strain in a recently manufactured container of King Nut peanut butter is notable. However, the S. Tennessee strain is not associated with an increase in illnesses now. The implicated plant in 2006–2007 is located approximately 70 miles from the PCA plant in Blakely. A possible association between the two outbreaks warrants further investigation. The relationship of the S. Tennessee finding to the current outbreak is being investigated further.

The mechanism of contamination for the current outbreak have not yet been determined. However, the recurring problem of Salmonella associated with contaminated peanut butter highlights the importance of including a kill step for harmful pathogens during manufacture (e.g., proper roasting) and of preventing contamination of peanut butter after the initial roasting process. Salmonella organisms persist indefinitely in high-fat, low-water-activity foods such as peanut butter (6), and in such foods, Salmonella can withstand temperatures as high as 194°F (90°C) for 50 minutes (7). Typically, peanuts for peanut butter are roasted at approximately 350°F (180°C), a temperature that should be sufficient to kill Salmonella in a short period. However, some temperatures used in processing peanut butter or paste in other products might be inadequate to eliminate Salmonella introduced after the initial peanut roasting.

When this outbreak was first detected, its source was not immediately apparent. A likely source of the current outbreak emerged only after several weeks of detailed case interviews, investigations of local clusters of illness, and joint epidemiologic efforts across states. Rapid traceback of the first implicated product to its point of manufacture was critical in unraveling the entire outbreak. Rapid investigation of apparently localized outbreaks can provide critical clues to solving large and dispersed national outbreaks. This outbreak illustrates again the central importance of the capacity to perform Salmonella serotyping and molecular subtyping in public health laboratories for detecting and investigating outbreaks, and the critical value of rapid epidemiologic and regulatory investigative capacity.

References

 

  1. CDC. Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) population survey data. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2006–2007. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet.
  2. CDC. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella serotype Tennessee infections associated with peanut butter—United States, 2006–2007. MMWR 2007;21:521–4.
  3. CDC. Public Health Laboratory Information Service (PHLIS) surveillance data: Salmonella annual summary, 2006. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2008. Available at www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/phlisdata/salmonella.htm.
  4. Voetsch AC, Van Gilder TJ, Angulo FJ, et al. FoodNet estimate of the burden of illness caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:S127–34.
  5. Scheil W, Cameron S, Dalton C, Murray C, Wilson D. A South Australian Salmonella Mbandaka outbreak investigation using a database to select controls. Aust N Z J Public Health 1998;22:536–9.
  6. Mattick KL, Jorgensen F, Legan JD, Lappin-Scott HM, Humphrey TJ. Habituation of Salmonella spp. at reduced water activity and its effect on heat tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;66:4921–5.
  7. Shachar D, Yaron S. Heat tolerance of Salmonella enterica serovars Agona, Enteritidis, and Typhimurium in peanut butter. J Food Protect 2006;69:2687–91.